Baseball, like other sports, has unique names for parts of the
playing surface that are used. Hockey has creases, where the goalie is
located defending his net; football has end zones, where touchdowns are
scored; curling has a hog line, where the rock must get past for it to
count; basketball has three point lines where a team can shoot and get a
three pointer; and baseball has the On Deck circle, where hitters stand
waiting. It is defined as an area in foul territory, measuring about 5 ½
feet in diameter, in close proximity to your team’s dugout, where the
next hitter is supposed to stand (warm up) as he prepares for his at
bat, following the hitter who is currently hitting. It is the designed
with the sole purpose for the next hitter to get physically and mentally
in tune to his upcoming at bat. It is designed for each player to
create and develop a routine that permits them to have the proper frame
of mind before entering the batter's box to fashion the duel with the
opposing pitcher. It is designed as the door mat that welcomes each
hitter to the inauguration of their plate appearance. This truly sounds
simple in its origin and purpose, however, the simplicity of its
beginning has taken on many a wrong purpose over the years of baseball.
The idea and thought process of many young, inexperienced hitters is
to use the on deck circle as a place to “get quick or get strong”. That
being the utilization of using a heavy implement, such as a bat weight,
doughnut or lead pipe to get the muscles ready to fire or get the
muscles to feel like they need to be contracted and hard before the at
bat. Well, this is actually not what the on deck primarily should be
used for. In fact, using an implement that is heavy essentially does the
opposite of what most hitters think.
There have been numerous studies over the years that in fact
will refute the long old paradigm of using a heavy weight in the on deck
circle in preparation to the at bat. These studies show that the use of
a heavy bat in developing increased bat speed prior to the at bat will
reduce one’s ability to swing the bat at optimal speed. Coop DeRenne,
a physical-education professor at the University of Hawaii, frames his
findings in hard numbers: Increase—or even decrease—the weight of your
bat between 10% and 13%, and you decrease bat speed from three to five
miles per hour. Other studies show similar findings, in that, players
that swing heavy implements prior to their at bat, will show slower bat
speed over the course of their at bat. Recent studies have even shown
that something called post-activation potentiation might be the best
"physical" warm up you can do in the on deck circle (Read more about it here in Graeme Lehman's excellent blog).
Having
said this then, what really is the function of the on deck circle? Well
we know it is not a small, round gym to workout in. So what is it?
Simple, it is the on deck hitter’s personal laboratory. That’s right,
their own lab, for a few precious minutes each and every game, where
they (the hitters) need to cleanse their minds, focus on the upcoming
task at hand and prepare mentally for that hitter-pitcher battle. So,
just how do they accomplish this mission?
Well, what is hitter trying to undertake in the on deck circle?
Certainly a routine is most critical. But, within that routine, what
really is going on should be the question? Hitters need to first and
foremost place themselves in a position that allows them the best angle
to observe the pitcher, his delivery, arm action, and sequence of
pitches. If that means the on deck hitter is out of the on deck circle
and the umpire says nothing, then stay there. This is not cheating, in
fact, it is getting an edge, taking what you can, doing the necessary
measures to try and increase the likelihood of a good at bat. In this
position, the hitter should be using his own bat, the game bat, to work
his timing to that of the pitcher's delivery while at the same
timefocusing on the sequence of pitches to the hitter in front of him
and the game situation that he potentially is walking into. With the
timing aspect, the key is getting the front foot down in time and in
sync with the ball coming out of the release window of the pitcher. The
routine needs to be cleansed and not clouded by outside interferences
that will distract one of the upcoming goals...a concentrated focus and
positive approach.
As hitters, we all train to be the best we can. Hours and hours of
dedicated work is put in lifting weights, becoming more flexible, more
agile, stronger and more explosive. An inordinate amount of time is
spent swinging the bat off a tee, front toss and batting practice, yet
many look at the on deck circle as “I’m next”. That’s fine, but if you
are next, what are you doing as the next hitter to prepare yourself for
the plate appearance? Think about it this way...if a hitter get’s four
at bats in a game, they are on deck four times. Those four on deck
appearances are limited in time. Everyone’s equal enemy is time and
therefore, those that make use of that precious time, which over the
course of a game is so limited, may have a better chance of finding
success as a hitter. Just think for a moment, the hours and hours of
dedicated preparation... lifting, running, eating and swinging a bat can
be easily flushed down the toilet with poor on deck preparation. Find
out what works best, create the routine, find the psychological edge,
limit the number of swings fashioned with a heavy bat and WIN the at bat
instead of giving it away with tired, slow muscle fatigue. Would a
world class sprinter work on endurance running? Nope! They would work on
the focus of running faster, becoming more explosive and carrying speed
through good fundamental movements of the body.
So hitters, use the on deck circle to refine your movements and make
them more efficient, not less efficient. You could be walking a fine
line by swinging a heavy bat that has negative effects on how hitting
movements are accomplished. Create your positive sacrament while awaiting ON DECK. Develop a routine. Study the pitcher. Get your timing set. Make it COUNT!
Sincerely,
Rick Johnston, Head Instructor - The Baseball Zone
Monday, December 30, 2013
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Jaeger Sports Baseball Throwing & Pitching Program -- Arm Health, Streng...
Throwing & Pitching Program
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
NCAA Concludes Study On Ball Seams - BaseballAmerica.com
The "flat seam" ball used in pro baseball travels farther than the raised seamed ball used in college baseball. The study follows:
NCAA Concludes Study On Ball Seams - BaseballAmerica.com
NCAA Concludes Study On Ball Seams - BaseballAmerica.com
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Friday, August 9, 2013
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Salaries - Major League Baseball
Average salary hits record $3.2M
Updated: December 7, 2012, 6:47 PM ET
Associated Press
547
316
25
Email
Print
NEW YORK -- Baseball's average salary increased 3.8 percent this year to a record $3.2 million.
It Pays (A Lot) To Play
The average baseball salaries of the last 10 years, as compiled by the Major League Baseball Players Association, and the minimum salary:
Year Minimum Average
2003 $300,000 $2,372,189
2004 $300,000 $2,313,535
2005 $316,000 $2,476,589
2006 $327,000 $2,699,292
2007 $380,000 $2,824,751
2008 $390,000 $2,925,679
2009 $400,000 $2,996,106
2010 $400,000 $3,014,572
2011 $414,000 $3,095,183
2012 $480,000 $3,213,479
According to final figures released Friday by the Major League Baseball Players Association, the rise was the steepest since 2007. The boost was helped by an increase in the minimum salary from $414,000 to $480,000.
The New York Yankees had the highest average for the 14th consecutive season at $6.88 million, rising after consecutive declines from a peak of $7.66 million when they won the World Series in 2009.
The Los Angeles Dodgers boosted their average from 13th to second at $5.55 million, followed by the Los Angeles Angels ($5.48 million) and AL champion Detroit ($4.95 million). Texas went up from 15th to fifth at $4.89 million.
At $684,940, Houston had the lowest average since the 2006 Florida Marlins at $594,722.
The Boston Red Sox and Cubs had their lowest averages since at least 2000. Boston dropped from third to 12th at $3.3 million and the Cubs seventh to 23rd at $2.1 million.
World Series champion San Francisco remained eighth, averaging $4.07 million. AL West champion Oakland was 28th at $1.79 million.
Kansas City rose from last in 2011 to 26th at $2.04 million, and Pittsburgh went up from 27th to 19th at $2.47 million.
The Marlins increased from 19th to 10th after adding free agents Jose Reyes, Mark Buehrle and Heath Bell but have traded them in the team's latest payroll slashes and will drop next year.
Among regulars at positions, first basemen took over from designated hitters as the highest average at $8.6 million, followed by DHs at $8.1 million. Third base was next at $7.1 million, followed by starting pitchers at $6.1 million, second basemen $4.9 million, outfielders $4.6 million, shortstops $4.2 million, catchers $3.4 million and relief pitchers $1.8 million.
Figures are based on Aug. 31 rosters and disabled lists, with 944 players averaging $3,213,479. Major League Baseball has not yet computed its final averages, which usually differ slightly because of methods of calculation.
Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Sunday, July 7, 2013
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Monday, July 1, 2013
Monday, June 24, 2013
Monday, June 17, 2013
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Baseball Gloves by Wilson
Pro Stock Leather - Each Wilson A2000 is constructed from world-famous Pro Stock Leather which is the secret behind the A2000's unmatched durability and lifespan.
Dual-Welting - Runs from the back fingertip all the way down to the binding, it pre curves the fingers, providing a stable and durable pocket
Pro Stock Patterns - Exclusive Hand designed patterns used by the pros
Dri-Lex - Ultra-breathable wrist lining transfers moisture from the skin, keeping your hands cool and dry.
Reinforced Single Post Web
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Friday, March 8, 2013
Winning Baseball
Part of the Coach's Companion series, veteran coach Trent Mongero's Winning Baseball for Intermediate to College Level covers everything from advanced mechanics for infield, outfield, pitcher, and catcher play to hitting mechanics and mental toughness strategies. Complete with insider tips for college and MLB prospects, over 100 photographs, and a four-hour instructional DVD, this is the ultimate, one-stop baseball reference.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
The Complete Guide To Pitching
The Complete Guide to Pitching is the most comprehensive pitching resource available. Derek Johnson, one of the game’s premier pitching coaches, takes you inside the art and science of pitching.
Walter Johnson Pitching Mechanics
Here's some fabulous footage of Walter "Big Train" Johnson's pitching mechanics. Johnson is among the hardest throwers ever to pitch in the Major Leagues.
Cole Hamels Mechanics
Cole Hamels Mechanics - Note as most Power Pitchers, his front shoulder is still closed and pointed directly toward the plate at foot strike.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Improve Velocity
Improve arm strength and velocity with weighted baseballs
The research conducted by DeRenne et al. supports the research and findings of the research done by Litwhiler and Hamm (2.) Litwhiler and Hamm conducted a 12-week overweight baseball throwing program with 5 college pitchers (2). The purpose of Litwhiler and Hamm’s research was to determine the affect an overweight implement had on throwing velocity and accuracy. Litwhiler and Hamm’s research differed from DeRenne et al in that their research was conducted over a longer period of time, they used heavier baseballs, and they tested accuracy as well. Although there were some different variables between the studies, results were very similar. Over a 12-week period from pre-test to post-test, throwing velocity increased an average of 5.0 m/s (2).
Throwing Under- and Overweighted Baseball, and Throwing Arm Injuries
The number of serious throwing arm injuries is increasing among amateur and professional baseball pitchers. In 2010, Dr. James Andrews performed 131 Tommy John surgeries; 31% of those were performed on youth and high school pitchers. With the number of throwing arm injuries happening today, it is interesting that there have been no reported arm injuries during research conducted with under- and overweighted baseballs (2). Escamilla et al (2000) states that most weighted implement research is only 10 to 12 weeks long and that may not be long enough to observe injury differences between throwing weighted balls and regulation balls (2). These authors also debate that the majority of the research conducted had an interest on weighted implements and their effect on performance and not injury, and this could have caused some researchers to overlook some injuries (2). In support of their throwing program, Fleisig et al. reported that participation in their throwing program may help reduce throwing arm injuries (2).
In spite of the belief that efficient mechanics help reduce throwing arm related injuries. Fleisig et al. reported no difference in throwing arm position, significant decreases in elbow varus torque and shoulder internal rotation torque; and increases in shoulder, elbow, and ball velocities when throwing a lighter 4 ounce baseball (2). Castagno et al. (2) on the other hand found different results when testing an overweight baseball. Castagno’s research showed greater shoulder ER during arm cocking, greater elbow extension angular velocity during arm acceleration, more forward trunk tilt near ball release and more elbow flexion throughout the pitch (2). It could be inferred that there is greater risk of injury in overweighted implements than in underweighted implements because of the kinetic changes to the throwing motion with overweight implements.
When to Implement Under- and Overweight Baseballs
In the review by DeRenne and Szymanski (2009), they touch on periodization in strength and conditioning programs and the different phases or cycles that make up that periodization. Research on weighted implements has all been completed in the offseason when there are no competitive games being played. DeRenne and Szymanski break down an annual periodization program into 3 phases: preparatory (preseason), competitive (season), and transition (offseason). All research on weighted implements have been completed during the preparatory, transition, and sub phase 1 of the competitive phase known as the pre-competitive phase (2). According to DeRenne and Szymanski, during the pre-competitive phase strength and conditioning coaches should focus on sport-specific, explosive movements that put the body in similar positions that mimic throwing and hitting. Since throwing a baseball, particularly weighted baseballs, is a very explosive movement; DeRenne and Szymanski believe that this is when weighted ball training should be implemented.
There have been no studies done on the kinematic and kinetic differences between throwing a regulation baseball and throwing under- and overweight baseballs (2). Kinetic analyses will provide coaches with details on shoulder and elbow force and torque data between throwing regulation baseballs and throwing under- and overweight baseball (2). Kinematic analyses will provide coaches with details on the mechanical changes that take place when throwing regulation baseballs compared to under- and overweight baseballs (2). Part of the reason why research hasn’t been conducted with weighted balls during the season is because there is no information on the mechanical and force changes caused in the throwing arm during weighted ball throwing. If there was information about these changes then coaches and researches would be able to better assess the risk of injury that comes with throwing weighted baseballs and thus determine if implementing weighted baseball training during the season would be appropriate.
Conclusion
Implementing an under- and overweight baseball throwing program for high school, college, and professional pitchers is appropriate and necessary for increasing the performance of these athletes. This type of training has many years of research to back it up; no reported injuries during this research, and have been proven to increase performance of high school, college, and professional pitchers (1).
Even after extensive research there are still some questions that have been left unanswered about implementing under- and overweight baseball training for pitchers. Future research should first focus on the kinetic and kinematic differences between throwing a regulation baseball and throwing under- and overweighted baseballs. These findings would allow coaches to see the effect this type of training has on the throwing arm and whether or not it would then be appropriate to implement this training during a competitive season.
Although no injuries have been reported during these relatively short studies (the longest study lasted 12 weeks), it would be beneficial for future research to be conducted on the injury risk of throwing weighted baseballs and the effects it has on rotator cuff strength and range of motion over an extended period of time. This will show whether or not throwing weighted baseballs is truly beneficial. If pitchers are increasing performance while putting them at a greater risk for injury, then the program would not be deemed appropriate training for pitchers.
All past studies have shown significant performance increases with no injuries reported during their research. Implementing under- and overweighted baseballs into a pitchers throwing program can be very advantageous for their pitching, but it is highly suggested that coaches follow the protocols proven successful by past studies.
As you can see from reading the review above, throwing under- and overweight baseballs can be very beneficial. As a coach I believe you have to know why you teach what you do. If you argue that weighted balls are bad for you, can you answer why? Because I have a lot of information that shows why they are good for you.
Hopefully everyone can take something away from this post that will help make them and their team better. And please leave any feedback about the post. I love hearing others thoughts and sharing ideas with other coaches. Stay tuned also, as I will be completing my weighted ball research next fall.
Thanks for taking the time to read this and good luck this spring & summer!
Randy Johnson Mechanics
Randy Johnson Pitching Mechanics - notice that his shoulders are still square to the plate and his lower body is open to the catcher at foot strike.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)